Is violence against men part of women's emancipation?

鈥淵ou become the attacker鈥?it is not about defending, but attacking back. It鈥檚 the ultimate reversal 鈥?you become the huntress not the hunted.
鈥omen no longer have to鈥?work in long skirts鈥?How is it that so many of us still don鈥檛 know how to hit?鈥? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=W0piEyfcVA...

In the video the counter-attack only ended when the man was totally incapacitated. Is the 'attack back / become the huntress' policy a metaphor for what has happened to the women鈥檚 movement?

Definitely not. Violence only begets violence, and any intelligent feminist understands that. Demeaning and violating a man in no way rights the wrongs done to women by men, and only widens the disparity between the two.

I don't believe so, no. I don't condone violence of any sort.

some not all people involed in women's emancipation think the only way to stop violence against them is to be even more violent, which leeds to more violence against them.

Some women have not realized women are already emancipated. Each woman should develop herself to be prepared for a problematic world.

Ok. Clothing to violence, right?

Clothing was/is an issue because heavy skirts, hooped underthings, and corsets restricted women's ability to move- in this context, it made it hard for women to run away from a threat.

I say was/is because a woman in a pencil skirt and heels may also not be able to run very fast.

Most women are not encouraged to learn self defense, though. They are discouraged from violent behavior, even if the behavior is designed for protection.

In the video- she claps his ears, knees him a couple of times, and wrests him to the floor. The same type of technique is shown in the class demo. What is going on here is a series of actions designed to get the attacker stunned, hurting, and on the floor while the attackee remains on their feet and mobile.

I think this is what they are getting at: the best self defense strategy is to either get away really fast, and if you are cornered, to hurt the attacker to slow them down AND THEN get away really fast.

So this is not about women rising up and kneeing you in the groin. It is about teaching women how to quickly defend themselves against and flee an attack.

Would you tell your mother or you daughter or your sister or your wife that she should not be able to escape an attacker, because it makes you uncomfortable to think they are capable of it?

No it has become about entitelment. The women arent attacking back at all, they expect somone else to do the work for them. A woman doesnt want to have to negotiate a higher pay herself, they want daddy goverment to step in and are calling for fixed loans for position x and x experience. Incredible. So essentially its still a crying feast.

And as for the video its just the latest self defense scam to make money out of womens fear, it looks so convincing in the demonstration when all the attacker does is groping and squirming in pain. Boxing it out with a man is majorly foolish, best self defense is pepper spray and something related. Women who rely on pepper spray get away, women who rely on the watered down kung fu taught to make money get pregnant.